AMD E2-3200
Intel Celeron 3765U
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD E2-3200 vs Intel Celeron 3765U

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2011
Released
Q2/2015
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: AMD E2-3200 or Intel Celeron 3765U? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The AMD E2-3200 has 2 cores and 2 threads with maximum working frequency of No turbo. The AMD E2-3200 was released on Q3/2011.

The Intel Celeron 3765U has 2 cores with 2 threads and No turbo of frequency. The Intel Celeron 3765U was released on Q2/2015.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD E2-3200
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.40 GHz left arrow 1.90 GHz
    Around -26% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron 3765U
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    15 W left arrow 65 W
    About 0.23 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD E2-3200 AMD E2-3200
Intel Celeron 3765U Intel Celeron 3765U
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD E2-3200 and Intel Celeron 3765U is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    AMD E2-3200 left arrow Intel Celeron 3765U
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    AMD E left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 7
  • CPU group
    AMD E2-3000 left arrow Intel Celeron 3000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD E2-3200 vs Intel Celeron 3765U by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    2.40 GHz left arrow 1.90 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD E2-3200 and Intel Celeron 3765U along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6379D left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    0.44 GHz left arrow 0.10 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.80 GHz
  • Execution units
    2 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    160 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 8
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 11.2
  • Technology
    40 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2010 left arrow Q1/2015
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD E2-3200 and Intel Celeron 3765U. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD E2-3200 and Intel Celeron 3765U you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1600 left arrow DDR3-1600
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 12
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs AMD E2-3200 and Intel Celeron 3765U.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD E2-3200 or Intel Celeron 3765U? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    65 W left arrow 15 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD E2-3200 and Intel Celeron 3765U CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Llano (K10) left arrow Kaby Lake U
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    FM1 left arrow BGA 1168
  • Release date
    Q3/2011 left arrow Q2/2015
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on AMD E2-3200 and Intel Celeron 3765U.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons