AMD FX-9830P
Intel Atom C5315
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD FX-9830P vs Intel Atom C5315

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2016
Released
Q2/2022
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: AMD FX-9830P or Intel Atom C5315? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The AMD FX-9830P has cores and threads with maximum working frequency of . The AMD FX-9830P was released on Q2/2016.

The Intel Atom C5315 has cores with threads and of frequency. The Intel Atom C5315 was released on Q2/2022.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD FX-9830P
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.00 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
    Around -25% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    35 W left arrow 38 W
    About 1.09 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
Intel Atom C5315
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests AMD FX-9830P vs Intel Atom C5315
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD FX-9830P AMD FX-9830P
Intel Atom C5315 Intel Atom C5315
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD FX-9830P and Intel Atom C5315 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    AMD FX-9830P left arrow Intel Atom C5315
  • Family
    AMD FX left arrow Intel Atom
  • CPU group
    AMD FX-9800 left arrow Intel Atom CE5300
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 3
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD FX-9830P vs Intel Atom C5315 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    4 / 4 left arrow 4 / 4
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Cores
    4x left arrow 4x
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Frequency
    3.00 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.70 GHz left arrow --
  • Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
    3.40 GHz left arrow --
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD FX-9830P and Intel Atom C5315 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge) left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.90 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    8 left arrow
  • Shader
    512 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow
  • Generation
    6 left arrow
  • Direct X
    12 left arrow --
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD FX-9830P and Intel Atom C5315. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD FX-9830P and Intel Atom C5315 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2400
  • Max. Memory
    64 GB left arrow 256 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 (Dual Channel) left arrow 2 (Dual Channel)
  • Bandwidth
    38.4 GB/s left arrow --
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • PCIe
    3.0 x 8 left arrow 3 x 12
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD FX-9830P or Intel Atom C5315? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    35 W left arrow 38 W
  • TDP up
    45 W left arrow --
  • TDP down
    25 W left arrow --
  • Tjunction max.
    90 \xc2\xb0C left arrow 100 \xc2\xb0C
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD FX-9830P and Intel Atom C5315 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Chip design
    left arrow Monolithic
  • Socket
    FP4 left arrow BGA 2106
  • L2-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 9.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Excavator (Bristol Ridge) left arrow Berryville
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow Unknown
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow Unknown
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q2/2022
Latest comparisons