Intel Celeron N2920
AMD GX-210JA
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD GX-210JA vs Intel Celeron N2920

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2013
Released
Q2/2013
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: AMD GX-210JA or Intel Celeron N2920? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The AMD GX-210JA has cores and threads with maximum working frequency of . The AMD GX-210JA was released on Q2/2013.

The Intel Celeron N2920 has 4 cores with threads and of frequency. The Intel Celeron N2920 was released on Q4/2013.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron N2920
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.86 GHz left arrow 1.00 GHz
    Around -86% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
AMD GX-210JA
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    6 W left arrow 7.5 W
    About 0.8 times less performance per watt
Performance tests
Real tests Intel Celeron N2920 vs AMD GX-210JA
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Celeron N2920 Intel Celeron N2920
AMD GX-210JA AMD GX-210JA
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Celeron N2920 and AMD GX-210JA is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Intel Celeron N2920 left arrow AMD GX-210JA
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow AMD G
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 left arrow AMD GX 1st Gen.
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Celeron N2920 vs AMD GX-210JA by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    1.86 GHz left arrow 1.00 GHz
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Celeron N2920 and AMD GX-210JA along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) left arrow AMD Radeon HD 8180
  • GPU frequency
    0.31 GHz left arrow 0.23 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.84 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 2
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 128
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 5
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q2/2013
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Celeron N2920 and AMD GX-210JA. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Celeron N2920 and AMD GX-210JA you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2 (Dual Channel)
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Celeron N2920 or AMD GX-210JA? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    7.5 W left arrow 6 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Celeron N2920 and AMD GX-210JA CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 1.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architecture
    Bay Trail left arrow Temash (Jaguar)
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1170 left arrow FT3
  • Release date
    Q4/2013 left arrow Q2/2013
Latest comparisons