Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Intel UHD Graphics 770
AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge)

Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge)

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2021

Comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 770 video card vs AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) video card by specifications and benchmarks. Intel UHD Graphics 770 runs at 0.300 GHz base clock speed and has 64 GB of memory, while video card AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) runs at 0.760 GHz base clock speed and has 2 GB of memory. The TDP of the first video card is --, and the second is --. Compare the table of benchmark results to find out which graphic card is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Report a bug
  • More memory
    64 GB left arrow 2 GB
    97% more memory
Reasons to consider
AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge)
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    0.760 GHz left arrow 0.300 GHz
    Around 61% better clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge)
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel UHD Graphics 770 Intel UHD Graphics 770
AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge)
GPU

Comparison of GPU cores for Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) graphics cards. The GPU core data contains the number of blocks (in the AMD documentation these blocks are called Shader Engine (SE), while Nvidia calls them Graphics Processing Clusters (GPC), words are different, the essence is the same) and ROP/TMUs (Raster Processing Units). These characteristics have a great influence on the GPU computing power.

  • Based on
    Intel UHD Graphics 770 left arrow AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge)
  • GPU Chip
    Integrated graphics left arrow Integrated graphics
  • Execution units
    32 left arrow 5
  • Shader
    256 left arrow 384
Memory

The values comparison for the amount, type and speed of memory, along with the bandwidth in the Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) GPUs. A sufficiently large amount of graphics memory with high frequency and adequate bandwidth positively affects the speed of high resolution texture processing.

  • Memory Size
    64 GB left arrow 2 GB
  • Memory Clock
    0.000 GHz left arrow 0.000 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    0 Gbps left arrow 0 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    0 GB/s left arrow 0 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    0 bit left arrow 0 bit
Clock Speeds

Let's compare the base and maximum frequency of the Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) graphics cards. These values are not displayed in the BIOS, but can be viewed with the help of diagnostic utilities such as GPU-Z or Everest.

  • Base Clock
    0.300 GHz left arrow 0.760 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.650 GHz left arrow
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
Thermal Design

Comparison of the thermal design power of the Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) GPUs. The TDP number determines the maximum power consumption of your graphics card. The specifications for computer ventilation and power supply are often based on the TDP numbers and should be optimized for it.

Cooler & Fans

Here we are going to look at the types of cooling systems for Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) as well as their sizes and performance. As a rule, fans with larger diameters have an advantage because they can move the same volumes of air while rotating more slowly than smaller fans. It should be noted that liquid cooling systems in addition to fans and aluminum radiators need some kind of pump, which can also be noisy.

Connectivity

Number and types of sockets for video output and connection in Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) GPUs.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 2
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow --
Featureset

In this section, we'll explore what functions the Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) GPUs have. In addition, we have added ray tracing support to achieve the proper simulation of light rays and shadows. The list can vary slightly depending on the manufacturer.

  • DirectX
    12 left arrow 12
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Let's compare how Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) support popular codecs h264, VP8, h265 / HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The availability of such video codecs helps reduce the load on the graphics card during the playback or creation of videos. This has a positive effect on reducing power consumption and heat generation by the GPU.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
Dimensions

The comparison of the Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) graphics cards dimensions. With knowledge of the exact measurements of the graphics card, you can check whether it is possible to put it in the case of your PC. We have also added support for PCI Express bus.

Additional data

Here you can find information about the type (for desktops or laptops) and architecture of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge), along with the sales starting time and the price at that moment. We provide a link to the GPU specifications directly from its manufacturer.

  • GPU Interface
    Integrated graphics left arrow Integrated graphics
  • Release date
    Q4/2021 left arrow Q2/2016
  • Structure size
    10 nm left arrow 28 nm
Latest comparisons