Intel Xeon Silver 4314
AMD EPYC Embedded 3351
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4314

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2021
Released
Q1/2018
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 or Intel Xeon Silver 4314? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 has cores and threads with maximum working frequency of . The AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 was released on Q1/2018.

The Intel Xeon Silver 4314 has cores with threads and of frequency. The Intel Xeon Silver 4314 was released on Q2/2021.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon Silver 4314
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.40 GHz left arrow 1.90 GHz
    Around -26% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
AMD EPYC Embedded 3351
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    80 W left arrow 135 W
    About 0.59 times less performance per watt
Performance tests
Real tests Intel Xeon Silver 4314 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3351
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Xeon Silver 4314 Intel Xeon Silver 4314
AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 AMD EPYC Embedded 3351
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon Silver 4314 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Intel Xeon Silver 4314 left arrow AMD EPYC Embedded 3351
  • Family
    Intel Xeon Silver left arrow AMD EPYC
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon Silver 4300 left arrow AMD EPYC Embedded 3000
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 1
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon Silver 4314 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    16 / 32 left arrow 12 / 24
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Cores
    16x left arrow 12x
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Frequency
    2.40 GHz left arrow 1.90 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    3.40 GHz left arrow 3.00 GHz
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon Silver 4314 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon Silver 4314 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3351. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Xeon Silver 4314 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2666 left arrow DDR4-2666
  • Max. Memory
    6144 GB left arrow 1024 GB
  • Memory channels
    8 (Octa Channel) left arrow 4 (Quad Channel)
  • Bandwidth
    -- left arrow 85.3 GB/s
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • PCIe
    4 x 64 left arrow 3.0 x 64
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon Silver 4314 or AMD EPYC Embedded 3351? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    135 W left arrow 80 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 60 W
  • Tjunction max.
    -- left arrow 105 \xc2\xb0C
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon Silver 4314 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3351 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Chip design
    Monolithic left arrow Chiplet
  • Socket
    LGA 4189 left arrow SP4
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 6.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    24.00 MB left arrow 32.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Ice Lake left arrow Snowy Owl (Zen)
  • Operating systems
    Windows 10, Linux left arrow Windows 10, Linux
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • Release date
    Q2/2021 left arrow Q1/2018
  • Release price
    743 $ left arrow --
  • Documents
    Technical data sheet left arrow --
Latest comparisons