Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2016
Released
Q4/2017
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 636? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 8 cores and 16 threads with maximum working frequency of 3.00 GHz. The Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 was released on Q1/2016.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 has 8 cores with 16 threads and 3.00 GHz of frequency. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 was released on Q4/2017.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.10 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
    Around -31% better clock speed
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    3.00 GHz left arrow 1.80 GHz
    Around 40% better overclocked clock speed
Reasons to consider
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
Report a bug
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 left arrow Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E5 left arrow Qualcomm Snapdragon
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 5
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E5 v4 left arrow Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  • Predecessor
    Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 left arrow --
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    2.10 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.00 GHz left arrow 1.80 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    16 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (8 Cores)
    2.60 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • A core
    -- left arrow 4x Kryo 260 Gold
  • B core
    -- left arrow 4x Kryo 260 Silver
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Qualcomm Adreno 509
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.72 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.72 GHz
  • Shader
    left arrow 128
  • Generation
    left arrow 5
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 12.1
  • Technology
    left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q2/2017
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 636. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2133 left arrow LPDDR4-1333
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow
  • PCIe lanes
    40 left arrow
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 636.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 636? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    85 W left arrow
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow None
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow
  • L3-Cache
    20.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architecture
    Broadwell E left arrow Kryo 260
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 2011-3 left arrow N/A
  • Release date
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q4/2017
  • Part Number
    -- left arrow SDM636
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 636.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons