Intel Celeron J4025
Intel Celeron G1620
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Celeron G1620

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2019
Released
Q1/2013
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: Intel Celeron J4025 or Intel Celeron G1620? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores and 2 threads with maximum working frequency of 2.90 GHz. The Intel Celeron J4025 was released on Q4/2019.

The Intel Celeron G1620 has 2 cores with 2 threads and 2.90 GHz of frequency. The Intel Celeron G1620 was released on Q1/2013.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron J4025
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    10 W left arrow 55 W
    About 5.5 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron G1620
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.70 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
    Around 26% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Celeron J4025 Intel Celeron J4025
Intel Celeron G1620 Intel Celeron G1620
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Celeron G1620 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Intel Celeron J4025 left arrow Intel Celeron G1620
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    9 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 left arrow Intel Celeron G1000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Celeron G1620 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    2.00 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.90 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    2.90 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Celeron G1620 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    Intel UHD Graphics 600 left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    0.25 GHz left arrow 0.65 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.70 GHz left arrow 1.05 GHz
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow 6
  • Shader
    96 left arrow 48
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    9.5 left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 11.0
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2017 left arrow Q4/2012
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Celeron G1620. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Celeron G1620 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR3-1333
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    6 left arrow 16
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Celeron G1620.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Celeron J4025 or Intel Celeron G1620? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    10 W left arrow 55 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Celeron G1620 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Gemini Lake left arrow Ivy Bridge S
  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1090 left arrow LGA 1155
  • Release date
    Q4/2019 left arrow Q1/2013
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on Intel Celeron J4025 and Intel Celeron G1620.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons