Intel Atom CE5315
Intel Celeron N3160
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Atom CE5315 vs Intel Celeron N3160

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2013
Released
Q1/2016
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: Intel Atom CE5315 or Intel Celeron N3160? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The Intel Atom CE5315 has cores and threads with maximum working frequency of . The Intel Atom CE5315 was released on Q1/2013.

The Intel Celeron N3160 has 4 cores with threads and of frequency. The Intel Celeron N3160 was released on Q1/2016.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Atom CE5315
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron N3160
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.60 GHz left arrow 1.20 GHz
    Around 25% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    6 W left arrow 15 W
    About 0.4 times less performance per watt
Performance tests
Real tests Intel Atom CE5315 vs Intel Celeron N3160
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Atom CE5315 Intel Atom CE5315
Intel Celeron N3160 Intel Celeron N3160
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron N3160 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Intel Atom CE5315 left arrow Intel Celeron N3160
  • Family
    Intel Atom left arrow Intel Celeron
  • CPU group
    Intel Atom CE5300 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000/N3000
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 8
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom CE5315 vs Intel Celeron N3160 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Frequency
    1.20 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron N3160 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics 400
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.32 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.64 GHz
  • Execution units
    left arrow 12
  • Shader
    left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 3
  • Generation
    left arrow 8
  • Technology
    left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q1/2015
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron N3160. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron N3160 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
  • Memory channels
    1 (Single Channel) left arrow 2
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom CE5315 or Intel Celeron N3160? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    15 W left arrow 6 W
  • TDP down
    10 W left arrow --
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom CE5315 and Intel Celeron N3160 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1283 left arrow BGA 1170
  • L2-Cache
    0.50 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Berryville left arrow Braswell
  • Virtualization
    Unknown left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    Unknown left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • Release date
    Q1/2013 left arrow Q1/2016
Latest comparisons