Intel Atom C5325
Intel Xeon D-2738
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Atom C5325 vs Intel Xeon D-2738

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2022
Released
Q1/2022
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: Intel Atom C5325 or Intel Xeon D-2738? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The Intel Atom C5325 has cores and threads with maximum working frequency of . The Intel Atom C5325 was released on Q2/2022.

The Intel Xeon D-2738 has cores with threads and of frequency. The Intel Xeon D-2738 was released on Q1/2022.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Atom C5325
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    41 W left arrow 88 W
    About 2.15 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon D-2738
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.50 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
    Around 4% better clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests Intel Atom C5325 vs Intel Xeon D-2738
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Atom C5325 Intel Atom C5325
Intel Xeon D-2738 Intel Xeon D-2738
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Atom C5325 and Intel Xeon D-2738 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Intel Atom C5325 left arrow Intel Xeon D-2738
  • Family
    Intel Atom left arrow Intel Xeon D
  • CPU group
    Intel Atom C5000 left arrow Intel Xeon D-2700
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 4
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom C5325 vs Intel Xeon D-2738 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    8 / 8 left arrow 8 / 16
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Cores
    8x left arrow 8x Sunny Cove
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Frequency
    2.40 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    -- left arrow 3.50 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
    -- left arrow 3.30 GHz
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom C5325 and Intel Xeon D-2738 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom C5325 and Intel Xeon D-2738. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Atom C5325 and Intel Xeon D-2738 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR4-2933
  • Max. Memory
    256 GB left arrow 1024 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 (Dual Channel) left arrow 4 (Quad Channel)
  • Bandwidth
    -- left arrow 93.8 GB/s
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • PCIe
    3.0 x 16 left arrow 4.0 x 32
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom C5325 or Intel Xeon D-2738? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    41 W left arrow 88 W
  • Tjunction max.
    100 \xc2\xb0C left arrow --
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom C5325 and Intel Xeon D-2738 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Chip design
    Monolithic left arrow Monolithic
  • Socket
    BGA 2106 left arrow BGA 2579
  • L2-Cache
    9.00 MB left arrow 15.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Parker Ridge left arrow Ice Lake
  • Operating systems
    Windows 10, Linux left arrow Windows 10, Linux
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel QAT left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • Release date
    Q2/2022 left arrow Q1/2022
  • Release price
    -- left arrow 713 $
  • Documents
    Technical data sheet left arrow --
Latest comparisons