Intel Atom C3308
Intel Pentium 957
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Atom C3308 vs Intel Pentium 957

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2017
Released
Q2/2011
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: Intel Atom C3308 or Intel Pentium 957? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The Intel Atom C3308 has 2 cores and 2 threads with maximum working frequency of 2.10 GHz. The Intel Atom C3308 was released on Q3/2017.

The Intel Pentium 957 has 2 cores with 2 threads and 2.10 GHz of frequency. The Intel Pentium 957 was released on Q2/2011.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Atom C3308
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.60 GHz left arrow 1.20 GHz
    Around -33% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    9.5 W left arrow 17 W
    About 1.79 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
Intel Pentium 957
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests Intel Atom C3308 vs Intel Pentium 957
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Atom C3308 Intel Atom C3308
Intel Pentium 957 Intel Pentium 957
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Atom C3308 and Intel Pentium 957 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Intel Atom C3308 left arrow Intel Pentium 957
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Atom left arrow Intel Pentium
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    Intel Atom C3000 left arrow Intel Pentium 900
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom C3308 vs Intel Pentium 957 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    1.60 GHz left arrow 1.20 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.10 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    2.10 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom C3308 and Intel Pentium 957 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.35 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.80 GHz
  • Execution units
    left arrow 6
  • Shader
    left arrow 48
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 2
  • Generation
    left arrow 6
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 10.1
  • Technology
    left arrow 32 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q2/2011
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom C3308 and Intel Pentium 957. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Atom C3308 and Intel Pentium 957 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-1866 left arrow DDR3-1066DDR3-1333
  • Max. Memory
    128 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    6 left arrow 16
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Atom C3308 and Intel Pentium 957.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom C3308 or Intel Pentium 957? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    9.5 W left arrow 17 W
  • Tjunction max.
    100 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom C3308 and Intel Pentium 957 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L2-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Denverton left arrow Sandy Bridge U
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1310 left arrow BGA 1023
  • Release date
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q2/2011
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on Intel Atom C3308 and Intel Pentium 957.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons