HiSilicon Kirin 920
Intel Xeon W-3223
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

HiSilicon Kirin 920 vs Intel Xeon W-3223

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2014
Released
Q2/2019
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: HiSilicon Kirin 920 or Intel Xeon W-3223? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The HiSilicon Kirin 920 has 8 cores and 8 threads with maximum working frequency of 1.70 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 920 was released on Q3/2014.

The Intel Xeon W-3223 has 8 cores with 8 threads and 1.70 GHz of frequency. The Intel Xeon W-3223 was released on Q2/2019.

Differences
Reasons to consider
HiSilicon Kirin 920
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon W-3223
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.50 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
    Around 63% better clock speed
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    4.20 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
    Around 60 % better overclocked clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests HiSilicon Kirin 920 vs Intel Xeon W-3223
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
HiSilicon Kirin 920 HiSilicon Kirin 920
Intel Xeon W-3223 Intel Xeon W-3223
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of HiSilicon Kirin 920 and Intel Xeon W-3223 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    HiSilicon Kirin 920 left arrow Intel Xeon W-3223
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Intel Xeon W
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 7
  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 920 left arrow Intel Xeon W-2200/3200
  • Successor
    -- left arrow Intel Xeon W-3323
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare HiSilicon Kirin 920 vs Intel Xeon W-3223 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    1.30 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    1.70 GHz left arrow 4.20 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 16
  • Turbo (8 Cores)
    1.70 GHz left arrow 4.00 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow normal
  • A core
    4x Cortex-A15 left arrow --
  • B core
    4x Cortex-A7 left arrow --
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in HiSilicon Kirin 920 and Intel Xeon W-3223 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-T628 MP4 left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.60 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.60 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow
  • Shader
    64 left arrow
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow
  • Generation
    Midgard 2 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow
  • Technology
    32nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q4/2012 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between HiSilicon Kirin 920 and Intel Xeon W-3223. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between HiSilicon Kirin 920 and Intel Xeon W-3223 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-1600 left arrow DDR4-2666
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 1024 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 6
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 64
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs HiSilicon Kirin 920 and Intel Xeon W-3223.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for HiSilicon Kirin 920 or Intel Xeon W-3223? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    left arrow 160 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for HiSilicon Kirin 920 and Intel Xeon W-3223 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv7-A32 (32 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 16.50 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 left arrow Cascade Lake W
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow LGA 3647
  • Release date
    Q3/2014 left arrow Q2/2019
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on HiSilicon Kirin 920 and Intel Xeon W-3223.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Apple Mac Pro (2019)
Latest comparisons