HiSilicon Kirin 9000
Intel Atom C3538
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Intel Atom C3538

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2020
Released
Q3/2017
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: HiSilicon Kirin 9000 or Intel Atom C3538? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has 8 cores and 8 threads with maximum working frequency of 3.13 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 was released on Q4/2020.

The Intel Atom C3538 has 4 cores with 8 threads and 3.13 GHz of frequency. The Intel Atom C3538 was released on Q3/2017.

Differences
Reasons to consider
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
Report a bug
  • More number of cores
    8 left arrow 4
    2 times more threads
Reasons to consider
Intel Atom C3538
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.10 GHz left arrow 2.05 GHz
    Around 2% better clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Intel Atom C3538
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 HiSilicon Kirin 9000
Intel Atom C3538 Intel Atom C3538
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of HiSilicon Kirin 9000 and Intel Atom C3538 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    HiSilicon Kirin 9000 left arrow Intel Atom C3538
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generation
    9 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 9000 left arrow Intel Atom C3000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Intel Atom C3538 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    2.05 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.13 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) left arrow normal
  • A core
    1x Cortex-A77 left arrow --
  • B core
    3x Cortex-A77 left arrow --
  • C core
    4x Cortex-A55 left arrow --
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in HiSilicon Kirin 9000 and Intel Atom C3538 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-G78 MP24 left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.76 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    24 left arrow
  • Shader
    384 left arrow
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow
  • Generation
    Vallhall 2 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow
  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q4/2020 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between HiSilicon Kirin 9000 and Intel Atom C3538. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between HiSilicon Kirin 9000 and Intel Atom C3538 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR4X-2133LPDDR5-2750 left arrow DDR4-2133
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 256 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 12
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 and Intel Atom C3538.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for HiSilicon Kirin 9000 or Intel Atom C3538? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    left arrow 15 W
  • Tjunction max.
    -- left arrow 100 °C
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for HiSilicon Kirin 9000 and Intel Atom C3538 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 8.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 left arrow Denverton
  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow BGA 1310
  • Release date
    Q4/2020 left arrow Q3/2017
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on HiSilicon Kirin 9000 and Intel Atom C3538.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons