HiSilicon Kirin 658
Intel Celeron N3050
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Intel Celeron N3050

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2016
Released
Q2/2015
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: HiSilicon Kirin 658 or Intel Celeron N3050? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has 8 cores and 8 threads with maximum working frequency of 2.35 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 was released on Q2/2016.

The Intel Celeron N3050 has 2 cores with 8 threads and 2.35 GHz of frequency. The Intel Celeron N3050 was released on Q2/2015.

Differences
Reasons to consider
HiSilicon Kirin 658
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.70 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
    Around -6% better clock speed
  • More number of cores
    8 left arrow 2
    2 times more threads
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    2.35 GHz left arrow 2.16 GHz
    Around 8% better overclocked clock speed
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a bug
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
Intel Celeron N3050 Intel Celeron N3050
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of HiSilicon Kirin 658 and Intel Celeron N3050 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    HiSilicon Kirin 658 left arrow Intel Celeron N3050
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 8
  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 650 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000/N3000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Intel Celeron N3050 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    1.70 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.35 GHz left arrow 2.16 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow normal
  • A core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow --
  • B core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow --
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in HiSilicon Kirin 658 and Intel Celeron N3050 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-T830 MP2 left arrow Intel HD Graphics 400
  • GPU frequency
    0.90 GHz left arrow 0.32 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.90 GHz left arrow 0.60 GHz
  • Execution units
    2 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    Midgard 4 left arrow 8
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    28nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2015 left arrow Q1/2015
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between HiSilicon Kirin 658 and Intel Celeron N3050. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between HiSilicon Kirin 658 and Intel Celeron N3050 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-933 left arrow DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 4
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs HiSilicon Kirin 658 and Intel Celeron N3050.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for HiSilicon Kirin 658 or Intel Celeron N3050? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    left arrow 6 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for HiSilicon Kirin 658 and Intel Celeron N3050 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 left arrow Braswell
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow BGA 1170
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q2/2015
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on HiSilicon Kirin 658 and Intel Celeron N3050.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons