HiSilicon Kirin 650
Intel Celeron J4125
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs Intel Celeron J4125

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2016
Released
Q4/2019
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: HiSilicon Kirin 650 or Intel Celeron J4125? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 has 8 cores and 8 threads with maximum working frequency of 2.00 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 650 was released on Q2/2016.

The Intel Celeron J4125 has 4 cores with 8 threads and 2.00 GHz of frequency. The Intel Celeron J4125 was released on Q4/2019.

Differences
Reasons to consider
HiSilicon Kirin 650
Report a bug
  • More number of cores
    8 left arrow 4
    2 times more threads
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron J4125
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
    Around 15% better clock speed
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    2.70 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
    Around 26 % better overclocked clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
Intel Celeron J4125 Intel Celeron J4125
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of HiSilicon Kirin 650 and Intel Celeron J4125 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    HiSilicon Kirin 650 left arrow Intel Celeron J4125
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 9
  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 650 left arrow Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs Intel Celeron J4125 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    1.70 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.00 GHz left arrow 2.70 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow normal
  • A core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow --
  • B core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow --
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in HiSilicon Kirin 650 and Intel Celeron J4125 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-T830 MP2 left arrow Intel UHD Graphics 600
  • GPU frequency
    0.90 GHz left arrow 0.25 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.90 GHz left arrow 0.75 GHz
  • Execution units
    2 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    Midgard 4 left arrow 9.5
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    28nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2015 left arrow Q4/2017
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between HiSilicon Kirin 650 and Intel Celeron J4125. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between HiSilicon Kirin 650 and Intel Celeron J4125 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-933 left arrow DDR4-2400LPDDR4-2400
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 8 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 6
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs HiSilicon Kirin 650 and Intel Celeron J4125.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for HiSilicon Kirin 650 or Intel Celeron J4125? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    left arrow 10 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for HiSilicon Kirin 650 and Intel Celeron J4125 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 left arrow Gemini Lake
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow BGA 1090
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q4/2019
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on HiSilicon Kirin 650 and Intel Celeron J4125.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Mini PC Intel Celeron J4125Synology DS720+ 2Bay NASQNAP NAS Intel Celeron J4125
Latest comparisons