HiSilicon Kirin 620
Intel Atom D2500
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Intel Atom D2500

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2015
Released
Q3/2011
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: HiSilicon Kirin 620 or Intel Atom D2500? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The HiSilicon Kirin 620 has 4 cores and 4 threads with maximum working frequency of 1.20 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 620 was released on Q1/2015.

The Intel Atom D2500 has 2 cores with 4 threads and 1.20 GHz of frequency. The Intel Atom D2500 was released on Q3/2011.

Differences
Reasons to consider
HiSilicon Kirin 620
Report a bug
  • More number of cores
    4 left arrow 2
    2 times more threads
Reasons to consider
Intel Atom D2500
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.86 GHz left arrow 1.20 GHz
    Around 35% better clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Intel Atom D2500
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
HiSilicon Kirin 620 HiSilicon Kirin 620
Intel Atom D2500 Intel Atom D2500
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of HiSilicon Kirin 620 and Intel Atom D2500 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    HiSilicon Kirin 620 left arrow Intel Atom D2500
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 620 left arrow Intel Atom D2000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Intel Atom D2500 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    1.20 GHz left arrow 1.86 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    1.20 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in HiSilicon Kirin 620 and Intel Atom D2500 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-450 MP4 left arrow Intel GMA 3600
  • GPU frequency
    0.53 GHz left arrow 0.40 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.53 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 4
  • Shader
    64 left arrow 32
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    Utgard left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    0 left arrow 10.1
  • Technology
    28nm left arrow 65 nm
  • Release date
    2012 left arrow Q4/2008
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between HiSilicon Kirin 620 and Intel Atom D2500. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between HiSilicon Kirin 620 and Intel Atom D2500 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR3 left arrow DDR3-1066
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 1
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs HiSilicon Kirin 620 and Intel Atom D2500.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for HiSilicon Kirin 620 or Intel Atom D2500? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    left arrow 10 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for HiSilicon Kirin 620 and Intel Atom D2500 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None
  • ISA extensions
    left arrow SSE3
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 1.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A53 left arrow Cedarview
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow BGA 559
  • Release date
    Q1/2015 left arrow Q3/2011
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on HiSilicon Kirin 620 and Intel Atom D2500.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons