Apple A16 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2100
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2100

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2022
Released
Q1/2021
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: Apple A16 Bionic or Samsung Exynos 2100? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The Apple A16 Bionic has cores and threads with maximum working frequency of . The Apple A16 Bionic was released on Q3/2022.

The Samsung Exynos 2100 has cores with threads and of frequency. The Samsung Exynos 2100 was released on Q1/2021.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Apple A16 Bionic
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Samsung Exynos 2100
Report a bug
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Apple A16 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Apple A16 Bionic and Samsung Exynos 2100 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Apple A16 Bionic left arrow Samsung Exynos 2100
  • Family
    Apple A series left arrow Samsung Exynos
  • CPU group
    Apple A16 left arrow Samsung Exynos 2100
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Generation
    16 left arrow 5
  • Predecessor
    Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) left arrow --
  • Successor
    -- left arrow Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2100 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    6 / 6 left arrow 8 / 8
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
  • A-Core
    2x Everest left arrow 1x Cortex-X1
  • B-Core
    4x Sawtooth left arrow 3x Cortex-A78
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • A-Core Frequency
    3.46 GHz left arrow 2.90 GHz
  • B-Core Frequency
    2.02 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Apple A16 Bionic and Samsung Exynos 2100 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores) left arrow ARM Mali-G78 MP14
  • GPU frequency
    0.70 GHz left arrow 0.76 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    160 left arrow 14
  • Shader
    1280 left arrow 224
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 1
  • Generation
    13 left arrow Vallhall 2
  • Direct X
    -- left arrow 12
  • Technology
    4 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Release date
    Q3/2022 left arrow Q4/2020
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Apple A16 Bionic and Samsung Exynos 2100. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Apple A16 Bionic and Samsung Exynos 2100 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR5-6400 left arrow LPDDR5-6400
  • Max. Memory
    6 GB left arrow 12 GB
  • Memory channels
    1 (Single Channel) left arrow 4 (Quad Channel)
  • Bandwidth
    51.2 GB/s left arrow 51.2 GB/s
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Apple A16 Bionic or Samsung Exynos 2100? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Apple A16 Bionic and Samsung Exynos 2100 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Technology
    4 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Chip design
    Chiplet left arrow
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • L2-Cache
    20.00 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    24.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architecture
    A16 left arrow Cortex-X1/-A78/-A55
  • Operating systems
    iOS left arrow Android
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Release date
    Q3/2022 left arrow Q1/2021
Latest comparisons