AMD E2-3200
AMD FX-8300
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD E2-3200 vs AMD FX-8300

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2011
Released
Q2/2013
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: AMD E2-3200 or AMD FX-8300? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The AMD E2-3200 has 2 cores and 2 threads with maximum working frequency of No turbo. The AMD E2-3200 was released on Q3/2011.

The AMD FX-8300 has 8 cores with 2 threads and No turbo of frequency. The AMD FX-8300 was released on Q2/2013.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD E2-3200
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    65 W left arrow 95 W
    About 1.46 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8300
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.30 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
    Around 27% better clock speed
  • More number of cores
    8 left arrow 2
    4 times more cores
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD E2-3200 AMD E2-3200
AMD FX-8300 AMD FX-8300
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD E2-3200 and AMD FX-8300 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    AMD E2-3200 left arrow AMD FX-8300
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD E left arrow AMD FX
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    AMD E2-3000 left arrow AMD FX-8000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD E2-3200 vs AMD FX-8300 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    2.40 GHz left arrow 3.30 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 4.20 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD E2-3200 and AMD FX-8300 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6379D left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    0.44 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    2 left arrow
  • Shader
    160 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow
  • Generation
    3 left arrow
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow
  • Technology
    40 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q4/2010 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD E2-3200 and AMD FX-8300. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD E2-3200 and AMD FX-8300 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1600 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 2
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs AMD E2-3200 and AMD FX-8300.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD E2-3200 or AMD FX-8300? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    65 W left arrow 95 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD E2-3200 and AMD FX-8300 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Llano (K10) left arrow Vishera (Bulldozer)
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    FM1 left arrow AM3+
  • Release date
    Q3/2011 left arrow Q2/2013
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on AMD E2-3200 and AMD FX-8300.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons