AMD E-300
Intel Celeron J3355E
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD E-300 vs Intel Celeron J3355E

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2011
Released
Q3/2016
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: AMD E-300 or Intel Celeron J3355E? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The AMD E-300 has 2 cores and 2 threads with maximum working frequency of No turbo. The AMD E-300 was released on Q3/2011.

The Intel Celeron J3355E has 2 cores with 2 threads and No turbo of frequency. The Intel Celeron J3355E was released on Q3/2016.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD E-300
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron J3355E
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
    Around 35% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    10 W left arrow 18 W
    About 0.56 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
Intel Celeron J3355E Intel Celeron J3355E
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD E-300 and Intel Celeron J3355E is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    AMD E-300 left arrow Intel Celeron J3355E
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    AMD E left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 7
  • CPU group
    AMD E/E1/E2-1000 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD E-300 vs Intel Celeron J3355E by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    1.30 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD E-300 and Intel Celeron J3355E along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6310 left arrow Intel HD Graphics 500
  • GPU frequency
    0.49 GHz left arrow 0.25 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.70 GHz
  • Execution units
    1 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    80 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 9
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    40 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2010 left arrow Q3/2016
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD E-300 and Intel Celeron J3355E. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD E-300 and Intel Celeron J3355E you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1066 left arrow DDR3-1866DDR4-2400
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 6
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs AMD E-300 and Intel Celeron J3355E.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD E-300 or Intel Celeron J3355E? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    18 W left arrow 10 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD E-300 and Intel Celeron J3355E CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Zacate (Bobcat) left arrow Apollo Lake
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 413 left arrow BGA 1296
  • Release date
    Q3/2011 left arrow Q3/2016
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on AMD E-300 and Intel Celeron J3355E.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons