AMD A8-3550MX
HiSilicon Kirin 950
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD A8-3550MX vs HiSilicon Kirin 950

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2011
Released
Q4/2015
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: AMD A8-3550MX or HiSilicon Kirin 950? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The AMD A8-3550MX has 4 cores and 4 threads with maximum working frequency of 2.70 GHz. The AMD A8-3550MX was released on Q4/2011.

The HiSilicon Kirin 950 has 8 cores with 4 threads and 2.70 GHz of frequency. The HiSilicon Kirin 950 was released on Q4/2015.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD A8-3550MX
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.80 GHz
    Around -11% better clock speed
  • Higher turbo clock speed
    2.70 GHz left arrow 2.30 GHz
    Around 15% better overclocked clock speed
Reasons to consider
HiSilicon Kirin 950
Report a bug
  • More number of cores
    8 left arrow 4
    2 times more cores
Performance tests
Real tests AMD A8-3550MX vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD A8-3550MX AMD A8-3550MX
HiSilicon Kirin 950 HiSilicon Kirin 950
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD A8-3550MX and HiSilicon Kirin 950 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    AMD A8-3550MX left arrow HiSilicon Kirin 950
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    AMD A left arrow HiSilicon Kirin
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 4
  • CPU group
    AMD A6-3000M left arrow HiSilicon Kirin 950
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD A8-3550MX vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.80 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.70 GHz left arrow 2.30 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • A core
    -- left arrow 4x Cortex-A72
  • B core
    -- left arrow 4x Cortex-A53
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD A8-3550MX and HiSilicon Kirin 950 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6620G left arrow ARM Mali-T880 MP4
  • GPU frequency
    0.44 GHz left arrow 0.90 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.90 GHz
  • Execution units
    5 left arrow 4
  • Shader
    400 left arrow 64
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    3 left arrow Midgard 4
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 11
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 16 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q2/2016
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD A8-3550MX and HiSilicon Kirin 950. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD A8-3550MX and HiSilicon Kirin 950 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1600 left arrow LPDDR4
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs AMD A8-3550MX and HiSilicon Kirin 950.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD A8-3550MX or HiSilicon Kirin 950? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    45 W left arrow
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD A8-3550MX and HiSilicon Kirin 950 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow None
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architecture
    Llano (K10) left arrow Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 16 nm
  • Socket
    FS1 left arrow N/A
  • Release date
    Q4/2011 left arrow Q4/2015
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on AMD A8-3550MX and HiSilicon Kirin 950.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons