Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7)

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2013

Comparison of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 video card vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) video card by specifications and benchmarks. Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 runs at 0.750 GHz base clock speed and has 2 GB of memory, while video card Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) runs at 0.400 GHz base clock speed and has 32 GB of memory. The TDP of the first video card is --, and the second is --. Compare the table of benchmark results to find out which graphic card is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    0.750 GHz left arrow 0.400 GHz
    Around 47% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7)
Report a bug
  • More memory
    32 GB left arrow 2 GB
    94% more memory
Performance tests
Real tests Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7)
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7)
GPU

Comparison of GPU cores for Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) graphics cards. The GPU core data contains the number of blocks (in the AMD documentation these blocks are called Shader Engine (SE), while Nvidia calls them Graphics Processing Clusters (GPC), words are different, the essence is the same) and ROP/TMUs (Raster Processing Units). These characteristics have a great influence on the GPU computing power.

  • Based on
    Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 left arrow Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7)
  • GPU Chip
    Integrated graphics left arrow Integrated graphics
  • Execution units
    40 left arrow 80
  • Shader
    320 left arrow 640
Memory

The values comparison for the amount, type and speed of memory, along with the bandwidth in the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) GPUs. A sufficiently large amount of graphics memory with high frequency and adequate bandwidth positively affects the speed of high resolution texture processing.

  • Memory Size
    2 GB left arrow 32 GB
  • Memory Clock
    0.000 GHz left arrow 0.000 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    0 Gbps left arrow 0 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    0 GB/s left arrow 0 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    0 bit left arrow 0 bit
Clock Speeds

Let's compare the base and maximum frequency of the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) graphics cards. These values are not displayed in the BIOS, but can be viewed with the help of diagnostic utilities such as GPU-Z or Everest.

  • Base Clock
    0.750 GHz left arrow 0.400 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.350 GHz left arrow 1.350 GHz
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
Thermal Design

Comparison of the thermal design power of the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) GPUs. The TDP number determines the maximum power consumption of your graphics card. The specifications for computer ventilation and power supply are often based on the TDP numbers and should be optimized for it.

Cooler & Fans

Here we are going to look at the types of cooling systems for Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) as well as their sizes and performance. As a rule, fans with larger diameters have an advantage because they can move the same volumes of air while rotating more slowly than smaller fans. It should be noted that liquid cooling systems in addition to fans and aluminum radiators need some kind of pump, which can also be noisy.

Connectivity

Number and types of sockets for video output and connection in Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) GPUs.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-Version
    -- left arrow 2.2
Featureset

In this section, we'll explore what functions the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) GPUs have. In addition, we have added ray tracing support to achieve the proper simulation of light rays and shadows. The list can vary slightly depending on the manufacturer.

  • DirectX
    11.1 left arrow 12
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Let's compare how Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) support popular codecs h264, VP8, h265 / HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The availability of such video codecs helps reduce the load on the graphics card during the playback or creation of videos. This has a positive effect on reducing power consumption and heat generation by the GPU.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
Dimensions

The comparison of the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7) graphics cards dimensions. With knowledge of the exact measurements of the graphics card, you can check whether it is possible to put it in the case of your PC. We have also added support for PCI Express bus.

Additional data

Here you can find information about the type (for desktops or laptops) and architecture of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80 (Tiger Lake G7), along with the sales starting time and the price at that moment. We provide a link to the GPU specifications directly from its manufacturer.

  • GPU Interface
    Integrated graphics left arrow Integrated graphics
  • Release date
    Q2/2013 left arrow Q3/2020
  • Structure size
    22 nm left arrow 10 nm
Latest comparisons