Select processor 1
Select processor 2
Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale)
Intel HD Graphics 400

Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) vs Intel HD Graphics 400

Comparison of Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) video card vs Intel HD Graphics 400 video card by specifications and benchmarks. Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) runs at 0.170 GHz base clock speed and has 2 GB of memory, while video card Intel HD Graphics 400 runs at 0.320 GHz base clock speed and has 8 GB of memory. The TDP of the first video card is --, and the second is --. Compare the table of benchmark results to find out which graphic card is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale)
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Intel HD Graphics 400
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    0.320 GHz left arrow 0.170 GHz
    Around 47% better clock speed
  • More memory
    8 GB left arrow 2 GB
    75% more memory
Performance tests
Real tests Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) vs Intel HD Graphics 400
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale)
Intel HD Graphics 400 Intel HD Graphics 400
GPU

Comparison of GPU cores for Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) and Intel HD Graphics 400 graphics cards. The GPU core data contains the number of blocks (in the AMD documentation these blocks are called Shader Engine (SE), while Nvidia calls them Graphics Processing Clusters (GPC), words are different, the essence is the same) and ROP/TMUs (Raster Processing Units). These characteristics have a great influence on the GPU computing power.

  • Based on
    Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) left arrow Intel HD Graphics 400
  • GPU Chip
    Integrated graphics left arrow Integrated graphics
  • Execution units
    12 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    0 left arrow 96
Memory

The values comparison for the amount, type and speed of memory, along with the bandwidth in the Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) and Intel HD Graphics 400 GPUs. A sufficiently large amount of graphics memory with high frequency and adequate bandwidth positively affects the speed of high resolution texture processing.

  • Memory Size
    2 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory Clock
    0.000 GHz left arrow 0.000 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    0 Gbps left arrow 0 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    0 GB/s left arrow 0 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    0 bit left arrow 0 bit
Clock Speeds

Let's compare the base and maximum frequency of the Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) and Intel HD Graphics 400 graphics cards. These values are not displayed in the BIOS, but can be viewed with the help of diagnostic utilities such as GPU-Z or Everest.

  • Base Clock
    0.170 GHz left arrow 0.320 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    0.500 GHz left arrow 0.700 GHz
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
Thermal Design

Comparison of the thermal design power of the Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) and Intel HD Graphics 400 GPUs. The TDP number determines the maximum power consumption of your graphics card. The specifications for computer ventilation and power supply are often based on the TDP numbers and should be optimized for it.

Cooler & Fans

Here we are going to look at the types of cooling systems for Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) and Intel HD Graphics 400 as well as their sizes and performance. As a rule, fans with larger diameters have an advantage because they can move the same volumes of air while rotating more slowly than smaller fans. It should be noted that liquid cooling systems in addition to fans and aluminum radiators need some kind of pump, which can also be noisy.

Connectivity

Number and types of sockets for video output and connection in Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) and Intel HD Graphics 400 GPUs.

  • Max. Displays
    0 left arrow 3
Featureset

In this section, we'll explore what functions the Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) and Intel HD Graphics 400 GPUs have. In addition, we have added ray tracing support to achieve the proper simulation of light rays and shadows. The list can vary slightly depending on the manufacturer.

  • DirectX
    10.1 left arrow 12
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Let's compare how Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) and Intel HD Graphics 400 support popular codecs h264, VP8, h265 / HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The availability of such video codecs helps reduce the load on the graphics card during the playback or creation of videos. This has a positive effect on reducing power consumption and heat generation by the GPU.

  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The comparison of the Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) and Intel HD Graphics 400 graphics cards dimensions. With knowledge of the exact measurements of the graphics card, you can check whether it is possible to put it in the case of your PC. We have also added support for PCI Express bus.

Additional data

Here you can find information about the type (for desktops or laptops) and architecture of Intel HD Graphics Ironlake (Arrandale) and Intel HD Graphics 400, along with the sales starting time and the price at that moment. We provide a link to the GPU specifications directly from its manufacturer.

  • GPU Interface
    Integrated graphics left arrow Integrated graphics
  • Release date
    2010 left arrow Q1/2015
  • Structure size
    45 nm left arrow 14 nm
Latest comparisons