Select processor 1
Select processor 2
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X

AMD Radeon R9 Fury vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury X

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2015

Comparison of AMD Radeon R9 Fury video card vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury X video card by specifications and benchmarks. AMD Radeon R9 Fury runs at 1.000 GHz base clock speed and has 4 GB of HBM memory, while video card AMD Radeon R9 Fury X runs at 1.050 GHz base clock speed and has 4 GB of HBM memory. The TDP of the first video card is 275 W, and the second is 275 W. Compare the table of benchmark results to find out which graphic card is better.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.050 GHz left arrow 1.000 GHz
    Around 5% better clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests AMD Radeon R9 Fury vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury X
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD Radeon R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 Fury
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X AMD Radeon R9 Fury X
GPU

Comparison of GPU cores for AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 Fury X graphics cards. The GPU core data contains the number of blocks (in the AMD documentation these blocks are called Shader Engine (SE), while Nvidia calls them Graphics Processing Clusters (GPC), words are different, the essence is the same) and ROP/TMUs (Raster Processing Units). These characteristics have a great influence on the GPU computing power.

  • Based on
    AMD Radeon R9 FURY left arrow AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
  • GPU Chip
    Fiji PRO CB (Fiji) left arrow Fiji XT C8 (Fiji)
  • Execution units
    56 left arrow 64
  • Shader
    3584 left arrow 4096
  • Render Output Units
    64 left arrow 64
  • Texture Units
    224 left arrow 256
Memory

The values comparison for the amount, type and speed of memory, along with the bandwidth in the AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 Fury X GPUs. A sufficiently large amount of graphics memory with high frequency and adequate bandwidth positively affects the speed of high resolution texture processing.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    HBM left arrow HBM
  • Memory Clock
    0.500 GHz left arrow 0.500 GHz
  • Memory Speed
    1 Gbps left arrow 1 Gbps
  • Memory Bandwith
    512 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    4096 bit left arrow 4096 bit
Clock Speeds

Let's compare the base and maximum frequency of the AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 Fury X graphics cards. These values are not displayed in the BIOS, but can be viewed with the help of diagnostic utilities such as GPU-Z or Everest.

  • Base Clock
    1.000 GHz left arrow 1.050 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.000 GHz left arrow 1.050 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Design

Comparison of the thermal design power of the AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 Fury X GPUs. The TDP number determines the maximum power consumption of your graphics card. The specifications for computer ventilation and power supply are often based on the TDP numbers and should be optimized for it.

  • TDP
    275 W left arrow 275 W
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans

Here we are going to look at the types of cooling systems for AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 Fury X as well as their sizes and performance. As a rule, fans with larger diameters have an advantage because they can move the same volumes of air while rotating more slowly than smaller fans. It should be noted that liquid cooling systems in addition to fans and aluminum radiators need some kind of pump, which can also be noisy.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial (Radiator) left arrow Axial (Radiator)
  • Fan 1
    1 x 120 mm left arrow 1 x 120 mm
  • Cooler-Type
    AIO water cooling left arrow AIO water cooling
Connectivity

Number and types of sockets for video output and connection in AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 Fury X GPUs.

  • Max. Displays
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v1.4a left arrow 1x HDMI v1.4a
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.2 left arrow 3x DP v1.2
Featureset

In this section, we'll explore what functions the AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 Fury X GPUs have. In addition, we have added ray tracing support to achieve the proper simulation of light rays and shadows. The list can vary slightly depending on the manufacturer.

  • Max. resolution
    4096x2160 left arrow 4096x2160
  • DirectX
    12_0 left arrow 12_0
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Let's compare how AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 Fury X support popular codecs h264, VP8, h265 / HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The availability of such video codecs helps reduce the load on the graphics card during the playback or creation of videos. This has a positive effect on reducing power consumption and heat generation by the GPU.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The comparison of the AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 Fury X graphics cards dimensions. With knowledge of the exact measurements of the graphics card, you can check whether it is possible to put it in the case of your PC. We have also added support for PCI Express bus.

  • Length
    195 mm left arrow 195 mm
  • Height
    115 mm left arrow 115 mm
  • Width
    39 mm left arrow 39 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
Additional data

Here you can find information about the type (for desktops or laptops) and architecture of AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon R9 Fury X, along with the sales starting time and the price at that moment. We provide a link to the GPU specifications directly from its manufacturer.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2015 left arrow Q2/2015
  • Launch Price
    549 $ (Reference) left arrow 649 $ (Reference)
  • Structure size
    28 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet
Latest comparisons