Samsung Exynos 2100
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) vs Samsung Exynos 2100

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2021
Released
Q3/2021
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) or Samsung Exynos 2100? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) has cores and threads with maximum working frequency of . The Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) was released on Q3/2021.

The Samsung Exynos 2100 has cores with threads and of frequency. The Samsung Exynos 2100 was released on Q1/2021.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Samsung Exynos 2100
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
Report a bug
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Samsung Exynos 2100 and Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Samsung Exynos 2100 left arrow Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
  • Family
    Samsung Exynos left arrow Apple M series
  • CPU group
    Samsung Exynos 2100 left arrow Apple M1
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Generation
    5 left arrow 1
  • Successor
    Samsung Exynos 2200 left arrow Apple M2 Max (30-GPU)
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    8 / 8 left arrow 10 / 10
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • A-Core
    1x Cortex-X1 left arrow 8x Firestorm
  • B-Core
    3x Cortex-A78 left arrow 2x Icestorm
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • A-Core Frequency
    2.90 GHz left arrow 3.20 GHz
  • B-Core Frequency
    2.80 GHz left arrow 2.06 GHz
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Samsung Exynos 2100 and Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-G78 MP14 left arrow Apple M1 Max (24 Core)
  • GPU frequency
    0.76 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    14 left arrow 384
  • Shader
    224 left arrow 3072
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 32 GB
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    Vallhall 2 left arrow 1
  • Direct X
    12 left arrow --
  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2020 left arrow Q3/2021
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Samsung Exynos 2100 and Apple M1 Max (24-GPU). Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Samsung Exynos 2100 and Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR5-6400 left arrow LPDDR5-6400
  • Max. Memory
    12 GB left arrow 64 GB
  • Memory channels
    4 (Quad Channel) left arrow 4 (Quad Channel)
  • Bandwidth
    51.2 GB/s left arrow 409.6 GB/s
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • PCIe
    left arrow 4.0
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Samsung Exynos 2100 or Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1 / PBP)
    left arrow 30 W
  • TDP up
    -- left arrow 60 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Samsung Exynos 2100 and Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Chip design
    left arrow Chiplet
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 28.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-X1/-A78/-A55 left arrow M1
  • Operating systems
    Android left arrow macOS
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow Apple Virtualization Framework
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    left arrow Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation
  • Release date
    Q1/2021 left arrow Q3/2021
  • Part Number
    -- left arrow APL 1104
Latest comparisons