Samsung Exynos 2100
Apple A16 Bionic
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2100

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2021
Released
Q3/2022
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: Apple A16 Bionic or Samsung Exynos 2100? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The Apple A16 Bionic has cores and threads with maximum working frequency of . The Apple A16 Bionic was released on Q3/2022.

The Samsung Exynos 2100 has cores with threads and of frequency. The Samsung Exynos 2100 was released on Q1/2021.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Samsung Exynos 2100
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
Apple A16 Bionic
Report a bug
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 2100
Apple A16 Bionic Apple A16 Bionic
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Samsung Exynos 2100 and Apple A16 Bionic is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Samsung Exynos 2100 left arrow Apple A16 Bionic
  • Family
    Samsung Exynos left arrow Apple A series
  • CPU group
    Samsung Exynos 2100 left arrow Apple A16
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Generation
    5 left arrow 16
  • Predecessor
    -- left arrow Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)
  • Successor
    Samsung Exynos 2200 left arrow --
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Apple A16 Bionic by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    8 / 8 left arrow 6 / 6
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • A-Core
    1x Cortex-X1 left arrow 2x Everest
  • B-Core
    3x Cortex-A78 left arrow 4x Sawtooth
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • A-Core Frequency
    2.90 GHz left arrow 3.46 GHz
  • B-Core Frequency
    2.80 GHz left arrow 2.02 GHz
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Samsung Exynos 2100 and Apple A16 Bionic along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-G78 MP14 left arrow Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores)
  • GPU frequency
    0.76 GHz left arrow 0.70 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    14 left arrow 160
  • Shader
    224 left arrow 1280
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    Vallhall 2 left arrow 13
  • Direct X
    12 left arrow --
  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2020 left arrow Q3/2022
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Samsung Exynos 2100 and Apple A16 Bionic. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Samsung Exynos 2100 and Apple A16 Bionic you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR5-6400 left arrow LPDDR5-6400
  • Max. Memory
    12 GB left arrow 6 GB
  • Memory channels
    4 (Quad Channel) left arrow 1 (Single Channel)
  • Bandwidth
    51.2 GB/s left arrow 51.2 GB/s
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Samsung Exynos 2100 or Apple A16 Bionic? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Samsung Exynos 2100 and Apple A16 Bionic CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Chip design
    left arrow Chiplet
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 20.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 24.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-X1/-A78/-A55 left arrow A16
  • Operating systems
    Android left arrow iOS
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Release date
    Q1/2021 left arrow Q3/2022
Latest comparisons