MediaTek MT8312
Intel Celeron N4100
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron N4100 vs MediaTek MT8312

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
2014
Released
Q4/2017
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: Intel Celeron N4100 or MediaTek MT8312? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The Intel Celeron N4100 has 4 cores and 4 threads with maximum working frequency of 2.40 GHz. The Intel Celeron N4100 was released on Q4/2017.

The MediaTek MT8312 has cores with 4 threads and 2.40 GHz of frequency. The MediaTek MT8312 was released on 2014.

Differences
Reasons to consider
MediaTek MT8312
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.30 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
    Around -18% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron N4100
Report a bug
Performance tests
Real tests MediaTek MT8312 vs Intel Celeron N4100
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
MediaTek MT8312 MediaTek MT8312
Intel Celeron N4100 Intel Celeron N4100
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of MediaTek MT8312 and Intel Celeron N4100 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    MediaTek MT8312 left arrow Intel Celeron N4100
  • Family
    Mediatek MT-Serie left arrow Intel Celeron
  • CPU group
    MediaTek MT83xx A7 left arrow Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 9
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare MediaTek MT8312 vs Intel Celeron N4100 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Frequency
    1.30 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in MediaTek MT8312 and Intel Celeron N4100 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-400 left arrow Intel UHD Graphics 600
  • GPU frequency
    0.50 GHz left arrow 0.20 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.50 GHz left arrow 0.70 GHz
  • Execution units
    1 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    16 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    1 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    Utgard left arrow 9.5
  • Technology
    28nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2008 left arrow Q4/2017
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between MediaTek MT8312 and Intel Celeron N4100. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between MediaTek MT8312 and Intel Celeron N4100 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 8 GB
  • Memory channels
    0 left arrow 2
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for MediaTek MT8312 or Intel Celeron N4100? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    left arrow 6 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for MediaTek MT8312 and Intel Celeron N4100 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow BGA 1090
  • L2-Cache
    0.26 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A7 left arrow Gemini Lake
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv7-A32 (32 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • Release date
    2014 left arrow Q4/2017
Latest comparisons