Intel Xeon E3-1270
Intel Celeron G1610T
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron G1610T vs Intel Xeon E3-1270

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2011
Released
Q1/2013
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: Intel Celeron G1610T or Intel Xeon E3-1270? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The Intel Celeron G1610T has 2 cores and 2 threads with maximum working frequency of No turbo. The Intel Celeron G1610T was released on Q1/2013.

The Intel Xeon E3-1270 has cores with 2 threads and No turbo of frequency. The Intel Xeon E3-1270 was released on Q2/2011.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Xeon E3-1270
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.40 GHz left arrow 2.30 GHz
    Around -48% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron G1610T
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    35 W left arrow 80 W
    About 0.44 times less performance per watt
Performance tests
Real tests Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs Intel Celeron G1610T
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Xeon E3-1270 Intel Xeon E3-1270
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Xeon E3-1270 and Intel Celeron G1610T is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Intel Xeon E3-1270 left arrow Intel Celeron G1610T
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E3 left arrow Intel Celeron
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E3 left arrow Intel Celeron G1000
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 3
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs Intel Celeron G1610T by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Frequency
    3.40 GHz left arrow 2.30 GHz
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Xeon E3-1270 and Intel Celeron G1610T along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.65 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 1.05 GHz
  • Execution units
    left arrow 6
  • Shader
    left arrow 48
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 3
  • Generation
    left arrow 7
  • Technology
    left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q4/2012
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Xeon E3-1270 and Intel Celeron G1610T. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Xeon E3-1270 and Intel Celeron G1610T you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1333 left arrow DDR3-1333
  • Max. Memory
    32 GB left arrow
  • Memory channels
    2 (Dual Channel) left arrow 2
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Xeon E3-1270 or Intel Celeron G1610T? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    80 W left arrow 35 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Xeon E3-1270 and Intel Celeron G1610T CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 1155 left arrow LGA 1155
  • L3-Cache
    8.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Sandy-Bridge left arrow Ivy Bridge S
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q1/2013
Latest comparisons