Intel Celeron 847
AMD E1-6010
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD E1-6010 vs Intel Celeron 847

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2011
Released
Q2/2014
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: AMD E1-6010 or Intel Celeron 847? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The AMD E1-6010 has 2 cores and 2 threads with maximum working frequency of No turbo. The AMD E1-6010 was released on Q2/2014.

The Intel Celeron 847 has 2 cores with 2 threads and No turbo of frequency. The Intel Celeron 847 was released on Q2/2011.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron 847
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
AMD E1-6010
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.35 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
    Around 19% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    10 W left arrow 17 W
    About 0.59 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Celeron 847 Intel Celeron 847
AMD E1-6010 AMD E1-6010
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Celeron 847 and AMD E1-6010 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Intel Celeron 847 left arrow AMD E1-6010
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow AMD E
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 4
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron 800 left arrow AMD E1/E2-6000
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Celeron 847 vs AMD E1-6010 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    1.10 GHz left arrow 1.35 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Celeron 847 and AMD E1-6010 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1) left arrow AMD Radeon R2 (Beema)
  • GPU frequency
    0.35 GHz left arrow 0.35 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.80 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow 2
  • Shader
    48 left arrow 128
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 6
  • DirectX Version
    10.1 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q1/2015
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Celeron 847 and AMD E1-6010. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Celeron 847 and AMD E1-6010 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 1
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Celeron 847 and AMD E1-6010.

  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Celeron 847 or AMD E1-6010? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    17 W left arrow 10 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Celeron 847 and AMD E1-6010 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
  • L3-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 1.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Sandy Bridge U left arrow Beema (Puma)
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1023 left arrow AM1
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q2/2014
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on Intel Celeron 847 and AMD E1-6010.

  • Used in
    Unknown left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons