Intel Atom C5310
AMD A12-9800
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD A12-9800 vs Intel Atom C5310

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2022
Released
Q3/2017
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: AMD A12-9800 or Intel Atom C5310? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The AMD A12-9800 has cores and threads with maximum working frequency of . The AMD A12-9800 was released on Q3/2017.

The Intel Atom C5310 has cores with threads and of frequency. The Intel Atom C5310 was released on Q2/2022.

Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Atom C5310
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    32 W left arrow 65 W
    About 2.03 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
AMD A12-9800
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.80 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
    Around 58% better clock speed
Performance tests
Real tests Intel Atom C5310 vs AMD A12-9800
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Intel Atom C5310 Intel Atom C5310
AMD A12-9800 AMD A12-9800
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Atom C5310 and AMD A12-9800 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    Intel Atom C5310 left arrow AMD A12-9800
  • Family
    Intel Atom left arrow AMD A
  • CPU group
    Intel Atom C5000 left arrow AMD A12-9800
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 7
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom C5310 vs AMD A12-9800 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    4 / 4 left arrow 4 / 4
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Cores
    4x left arrow 4x Excavator
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Frequency
    1.60 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    -- left arrow 4.20 GHz
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom C5310 and AMD A12-9800 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge)
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 1.11 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    left arrow 8
  • Shader
    left arrow 512
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 2
  • Generation
    left arrow 6
  • Direct X
    -- left arrow 12
  • Technology
    left arrow 28 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q2/2016
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom C5310 and AMD A12-9800. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Atom C5310 and AMD A12-9800 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2400
  • Max. Memory
    256 GB left arrow 64 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 (Dual Channel) left arrow 2 (Dual Channel)
  • Bandwidth
    -- left arrow 38.4 GB/s
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • PCIe
    3.0 x 12 left arrow 3.0 x 8
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom C5310 or AMD A12-9800? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    32 W left arrow 65 W
  • Tjunction max.
    100 \xc2\xb0C left arrow 90 \xc2\xb0C
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom C5310 and AMD A12-9800 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Technology
    10 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Chip design
    Monolithic left arrow
  • Socket
    BGA 2106 left arrow AM4 (LGA 1331)
  • L2-Cache
    9.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Parker Ridge left arrow Excavator (Bristol Ridge)
  • Operating systems
    Windows 10, Linux left arrow Windows 10, Linux
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel QAT left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4
  • Release date
    Q2/2022 left arrow Q3/2017
  • Part Number
    -- left arrow AD9800AUABBOX
  • Documents
    Technical data sheet left arrow --
Latest comparisons