HiSilicon Kirin 960
Intel Celeron 847
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Intel Celeron 847

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2016
Released
Q2/2011
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: HiSilicon Kirin 960 or Intel Celeron 847? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The HiSilicon Kirin 960 has 8 cores and 8 threads with maximum working frequency of 2.40 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 960 was released on Q4/2016.

The Intel Celeron 847 has 2 cores with 8 threads and 2.40 GHz of frequency. The Intel Celeron 847 was released on Q2/2011.

Differences
Reasons to consider
HiSilicon Kirin 960
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.80 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
    Around -64% better clock speed
  • More number of cores
    8 left arrow 2
    2 times more threads
  • Performance per watt
    5 W left arrow 17 W
    About 3.4 0.97 times less performance per watt
Reasons to consider
Intel Celeron 847
Report a bug
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
HiSilicon Kirin 960 HiSilicon Kirin 960
Intel Celeron 847 Intel Celeron 847
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Intel Celeron 847 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    HiSilicon Kirin 960 left arrow Intel Celeron 847
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    5 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 960 left arrow Intel Celeron 800
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Intel Celeron 847 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Frequency
    1.80 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.40 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 2
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow normal
  • A core
    4x Cortex-A73 left arrow --
  • B core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow --
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Intel Celeron 847 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-G71 MP8 left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    0.90 GHz left arrow 0.35 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.80 GHz
  • Execution units
    8 left arrow 6
  • Shader
    256 left arrow 48
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    Bifrost 1 left arrow 6
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 10.1
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q2/2011
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Intel Celeron 847. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Intel Celeron 847 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR4-1600 left arrow DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
  • Max. Memory
    6 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 16
Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Intel Celeron 847.

  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for HiSilicon Kirin 960 or Intel Celeron 847? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    5 W left arrow 17 W
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Intel Celeron 847 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 left arrow Sandy Bridge U
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow BGA 1023
  • Release date
    Q4/2016 left arrow Q2/2011
Devices using this processor

List of devices based on HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Intel Celeron 847.

  • Used in
    Huawei Honor 8 ProHuawei Honor 9Huawei Mate 9Huawei Mate 9 ProHuawei Mate 9 PorscheHuawei MediaPad M5Huawei Nova 2sHuawei P10 left arrow Unknown
Latest comparisons