HiSilicon Kirin 658
MediaTek MT6595
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs MediaTek MT6595

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2016
Released
Q1/2014
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: HiSilicon Kirin 658 or MediaTek MT6595? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has 8 cores and 8 threads with maximum working frequency of 2.35 GHz. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 was released on Q2/2016.

The MediaTek MT6595 has cores with 8 threads and 2.35 GHz of frequency. The MediaTek MT6595 was released on Q1/2014.

Differences
Reasons to consider
HiSilicon Kirin 658
Report a bug
Reasons to consider
MediaTek MT6595
Report a bug
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
MediaTek MT6595 MediaTek MT6595
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of HiSilicon Kirin 658 and MediaTek MT6595 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    HiSilicon Kirin 658 left arrow MediaTek MT6595
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Mediatek MT-Serie
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 650 left arrow MediaTek MT65xx A17/A7
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs MediaTek MT6595 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in HiSilicon Kirin 658 and MediaTek MT6595 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-T830 MP2 left arrow PowerVR G6200
  • GPU frequency
    0.90 GHz left arrow 0.60 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.90 GHz left arrow 0.60 GHz
  • Execution units
    2 left arrow 2
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 32
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    Midgard 4 left arrow
  • Technology
    28nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2015 left arrow Q1/2012
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between HiSilicon Kirin 658 and MediaTek MT6595. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between HiSilicon Kirin 658 and MediaTek MT6595 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-933 left arrow LPDDR3-933
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2 (Dual Channel)
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for HiSilicon Kirin 658 or MediaTek MT6595? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for HiSilicon Kirin 658 and MediaTek MT6595 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv7-A32 (32 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 left arrow Cortex-A9
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q1/2014
Latest comparisons