AMD A12-9800
Intel Atom C3950
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Atom C3950 vs AMD A12-9800

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2017
Released
Q3/2017
Overall score
star star star star star

Which one of the central processing units is better: Intel Atom C3950 or AMD A12-9800? On this page we compare the technical data and benchmark results of different CPUs.

The Intel Atom C3950 has 16 cores and 16 threads with maximum working frequency of 2.20 GHz. The Intel Atom C3950 was released on Q3/2017.

The AMD A12-9800 has cores with 16 threads and 2.20 GHz of frequency. The AMD A12-9800 was released on Q3/2017.

Differences
Reasons to consider
AMD A12-9800
Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.80 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
    Around -124% better clock speed
Reasons to consider
Intel Atom C3950
Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    24 W left arrow 65 W
    About 0.37 times less performance per watt
Performance tests
Real tests AMD A12-9800 vs Intel Atom C3950
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
AMD A12-9800 AMD A12-9800
Intel Atom C3950 Intel Atom C3950
CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD A12-9800 and Intel Atom C3950 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

  • Name
    AMD A12-9800 left arrow Intel Atom C3950
  • Family
    AMD A left arrow Intel Atom
  • CPU group
    AMD A12-9800 left arrow Intel Atom C3000
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 2
CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD A12-9800 vs Intel Atom C3950 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Frequency
    3.80 GHz left arrow 1.70 GHz
Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD A12-9800 and Intel Atom C3950 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge) left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    1.11 GHz left arrow
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    8 left arrow
  • Shader
    512 left arrow
  • Max. GPU Memory
    2 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow
  • Generation
    6 left arrow
  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow
Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD A12-9800 and Intel Atom C3950. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD A12-9800 and Intel Atom C3950 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2400
  • Max. Memory
    64 GB left arrow 256 GB
  • Memory channels
    2 (Dual Channel) left arrow 2
  • ECC
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD A12-9800 or Intel Atom C3950? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

  • TDP (PL1)
    65 W left arrow 24 W
  • Tjunction max.
    90 \xc2\xb0C left arrow 100 °C
Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD A12-9800 and Intel Atom C3950 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

  • Technology
    28 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    AM4 (LGA 1331) left arrow BGA 1310
  • L2-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 16.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Excavator (Bristol Ridge) left arrow Denverton
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • Release date
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q3/2017
  • Part Number
    AD9800AUABBOX left arrow --
Latest comparisons